Three ways to
work together.

Keep it — or don't. Your tracker answers "who and when". A brief hub answers "what exactly and how it should look" — structured briefs, role views, brief-to-asset traceability. We integrate with your tracker or replace it, your call.

The code is yours, the stack is boring, the docs are thorough, and an independent QA engineer knows the codebase. Any competent developer picks it up. We design for our own replaceability.

If you're an enterprise with an admin team — maybe you should. If you're 5–50 people, you'll pay €30–60K every year for a platform you'll bend your process around. We build around your process, once.

They can — the question is when, and at what cost. Your developers have a product roadmap; this project will lose every prioritization meeting (that's why the problem still isn't fixed). A duo pulled for 2–3 months costs more than our fixed price in salary alone, before counting what they didn't ship. And AI compresses typing, not decisions: 90% of this work is knowing what to build — process diagnosis, role logic, adoption. If you still prefer building in-house: take our Blueprint package — we deliver the spec, architecture and design system, your team builds on top, we review. Both paths work; doing nothing is the only losing one.

AI writes code fast; a senior designer-builder decides what to build, and an independent engineer reviews security and quality before handover. You get the speed without the slop.

Discovery in 2 weeks. A working core your team can click through in 4–6 weeks. Full delivery in 2–4 months depending on scope — we'll fix the timeline in the quote.

Built to GDPR standard — the strictest in the world, so CCPA, LGPD and similar regimes are covered by default. Deployed on your infrastructure at handover, hosted in your region: EU, US, wherever your data must live. DPA available. We never train anything on your data.